I Read The Propaganda On Utusan Malaysia, And I Nearly Puked

I present to you, Operasi Belasah Pakatan Rakyat and Operasi Buat Orang Melayu Benci Yang Bukan Melayu. This is journalism as its best, presented to you by Utusan Malaysia (I wonder which political party has a business interest in Utusan).

28th May 2008

Henti keluar kenyataan cabar orang Melayu

“Kit Siang tidak perlu sibuk-sibuk mengeluarkan kenyataan berkaitan ketuanan Melayu kerana tanah ini hak orang Melayu, jadi, tiada siapa yang berhak boleh mempertikaikannya.”

27th May 2008

DAP dicabar buktikan ketuanan Melayu langgar Perlembagaan

“Pihak tertentu yang masih mempertikaikan hak istimewa dan ketuanan Melayu adalah golongan yang buta sejarah dan sengaja mewujudkan sentimen bagi kepentingan politik masing-masing.”

Politik naif kerajaan campuran Selangor

Jelasnya, langkah kerajaan Selangor itu hanya untuk memenuhi agenda Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) yang berasaskan politik kebencian dan permusuhan terhadap Barisan Nasional (BN).

Selain itu, katanya, ia turut dilihat sebagai memenuhi agenda DAP yang menentang sebarang usaha untuk menegakkan Islam.

MMMM pantau isu kedaulatan Melayu

“Kita juga akan lihat soal hak-hak Melayu seperti pemberian biasiswa yang termaktub dalam Perlembagaan, yang tidak wajar dipersoalkan oleh mana-mana pihak.”

Well, I haven’t been able to go dig deeper into the archives (I didn’t want to anymore, got a bit sick of the crap) but there has been other news reports that incite the Malays against non-Malays, especially the pig farm issue in Selangor a few months ago. Is this why Pakatan Rakyat has been calling for a boycott of this newspaper? Some BN supporters will otherwise claim that Malaysiakini is biased towards the opposition and should support a boycott of Malaysiakini. I don’t know if I agree with that, but I can certainly say that the reporting is certainly more balanced than the emotional crap in Utusan.

What worries me with the tone of Utusan Malaysia is the “you vs. me” mentality that is being cultivated and hatched into the minds of Utusan’s Malay readers. The “you vs. me” mentality was responsible for the apartheid in South Africa. The “you vs. me” mentality was responsible for May 13th 1969. The “you vs. me” mentality was responsible for the Rwanda genocide.

Don’t believe in the power of propaganda and the danger of the “you vs. me” mentality? I present to you my favorite article on propaganda, and I guarantee you it will be worth your time to read if you slowly take time to digest the message. You will some parallels to what is happening here in our country.

How Propaganda Works
by Bob Wallace

“Once you base your whole life striving on a desperate lie, and try to implement that lie, you instrument your own undoing.”

- Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death.

It’s not hard to understand how propaganda works. You don’t need a college degree, or to read any of those thick textbooks everyone hates. Everything relevant can be explained in one not-particularly-long article. And, I guarantee you, you must understand how propaganda targets you, to immunize yourself against the attempts.

Propaganda works by appealing to our most base, animalistic instincts. It does not appeal to our better nature, although one of the purposes of it is to convince us it does. It pretends to appeal to our reason, when in fact it appeals to our most primitive emotions. There is good reason for this: perception travels through the emotional brain first, to the rational brain last.

Specifically, propaganda works by appealing to three things: emotionalism, tribalism and narcissism.

I just mentioned perception travels first to the emotional brain, then the rational brain. This happens to everyone, including people who con themselves that they are the most rational and intelligent of intellectuals.

As for tribes, we share with nearly every animal in the world the instinct to form tribes, arranged in a hierarchy, with a leader. We are group animals. The fact we look to a leader to take care of us is one of the most firmly established principles in psychology (if you don’t remember anything else, remember that).

When anyone transgresses the taboos of a tribe, they can, and often are, ostracised or even expelled. An example? Say some people oppose a war. What happens? They are often called cowards and told to leave the country. Who hasn’t heard the insult, “You’re a coward! If you don’t like it here, get out!” People who say such things think they’re being patriotic; in reality they’re acting like animals. Emotional, irrational, herd animals, prone to the fear and flight activated by propaganda. Individuals think; groups do not, and cannot.

Narcissism is our inborn tendency to see everything as grandiose or devalued, good or bad, with nothing in-between. It’s why nearly every tribe in the world — and nations are just tribes writ large — called itself “the People,” “the Humans,” “the Chosen,” “the Motherland,” “the Fatherland,” or “the greatest nation on earth,” relegating everyone outside the tribe to a devalued non-people, non-human status (aka “collateral damage”). No wonder it’s so easy to kill the outsiders — they’re just not quite human.

When you combine those three concepts, you have the basis for all propaganda. If a leader of a tribe tells the people their goodness is under attack by insane, evil people who want to destroy them, they will react just like animals and attack. The Nazi Goering noticed all you had to do to get people to march off to war is for the leaders to tell them they were under attack, denounce protesters as traitors exposing the tribe to danger, and the people would slander, ostracize and expel the protesters, and then tramp straight off to be slaughtered. He said this technique worked in every country of the world.

The Bush administration used exactly this technique to start two wars. Essentially they told the public that our goodness was under attack by insane and evil people who wanted to destroy us. See how it works? Tribalism, emotionalism, and narcissism.

Supporters of the war responded by attacking protestors as traitors — trying to expel them from the tribe — and marching off to war. It’s altogether too simple, and too easy.

One man everyone should know is Edward L. Bernays, the American disciple and nephew of Sigmund Freud. He was for all practical purposes the founder of modern propaganda techniques.

Bernays despised most people and regarded them as his inferiors, especially because of intellectual or social claims. (See how it works? I just appealed to your emotions, and convinced you Bernays was attacking you. You fell for it, right?)

Bernays not only pretty much founded modern propaganda techniques, but was also the father of modern PR. Although, you could say they are same thing, and that there’s really no difference between them.

In his 1928 book, Propaganda, Bernays wrote, “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country…”

Remember that quote. Burn it into your memory. Bernays thought people should be ruled by an extremely small elite, who should manipulate them through propaganda. That means you. People who believe in the wonders of government, and that it is their friend, should think twice about it.

In another book, In Crystallizing Public Opinion, Bernays wrote how governments and advertisers can “regiment the mind like the military regiments the body.” This can be imposed, he said, because of “the natural inherent flexibility of individual human nature,” and suggested the “average citizen is the world’s most efficient censor. His own mind is the greatest barrier between him and the facts. His own ‘logic-proof compartments,’ his own absolutism are the obstacles which prevent him from seeing in terms of experience and thought rather than in terms of group reaction.”

Bernays also thought “physical loneliness is a real terror to the gregarious animal, and that association with the herd causes a feeling of security. In man this fear of loneliness creates a desire for identification with the herd in matters of opinion.”

Bernays claimed that “the group mind does not think in the strict sense of the word…In making up its mind, its first impulse is usually to follow the example of a trusted leader. This is one of the most firmly established principles in mass psychology.” What Bernays called the “regimentation of the mind” is accomplished by taking advantage of the human tendency to self-deception [logic-proof compartments], gregariousness [the herd instinct], individualism [exalting their vanity] and the seductive power of a strong leader.

Bernays also expressed the opinion people “have to take sides…[they] must step out of the audience onto the stage and wrestle as the hero for the victory of good over evil.” This also means appealing to our narcissism, our inborn tendency to see everything as either good or bad, with little or nothing in-between.

He also noted the need for people to feel as if they belong to something larger than themselves. Again, this also means appealing to our narcissism, such as people claiming they belong to “the greatest nation on earth.”

When people consider themselves as part of the Humans (by whatever name they call themselves), they exalt themselves. Still again, those outside the tribe are non-people, “collateral damage.”

“Mental habits create stereotypes just as physical habits create certain definite reflex actionism,” Bernays wrote. “…these stereotypes or clichés are not necessarily truthful pictures of what they are supposed to portray.” Perception is everything, the truth matters little or not at all.

Now, let’s boil all this down and see what we have:

Mass Man, the herd, cannot think, and is instead ruled by its feelings. The herd will look to a leader to save it. The best way to accomplish this is for the herd to feel it is under attack. The herd will draw together, expel those who see the truth and protest, and then march off to war.

The full quote from Goering? “Naturally the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

Tell the herd they are the Humans, or the People, or best of all, have God on their side. Paint their enemies as insane and evil. Again, this is appealing to people’s narcissism, the tendency to see everything as either good (us) or evil (them). Evoke paranoia and hysteria in them by convincing them the insane evil ones want to conquer and destroy them. What will happen? You can get them to march off to war by the millions, just as Goering noticed. The truth doesn’t matter, only the manipulation of perception.

To make it as simple as possible, everything that is needed for a successful propaganda campaign can be summed up in those three aforementioned words: emotionalism, tribalism and narcissism.

We con ourselves we are so advanced. In reality, the human race is stuck in One Million Years BC, except there’s no Raquel Welch in a two-piece fur bikini.

You Might Find These Interesting

Thank you for reading Malaysians Say The Darndest Things! If you like what you just read, you should consider subscribing to this blog in a feedreader. Alternatively, you could also subscribe via email, and you will get a daily digest of the day's posts. Your email is strictly protected and will never be used for spam or marketing purposes.

15 Responses to “I Read The Propaganda On Utusan Malaysia, And I Nearly Puked”

Add your comment

  1. DeltaP said:

    Let’s take it a step further and boycott TV3 as well. I just saw their 1:30pm news a while ago. Not only did they have absolutely no coverage on the Bandar Mahkota Cheras issue, they interviewed a BN guy and issued a criticism to the DAP-led Penang state government straight from the anchorwoman’s mouth. Pakatan Rakyat leaders should kick out these biased journalists from from any interviews or conferences.

    May 29, 2008 at 2:10 pm

  2. Kenny Law said:

    DeltaP,
    I think it is pretty common for an anchorperson to assert an opinion in an interview, it happens in CNN or other news media as well. What is unacceptable is the general tone of reporting of news, especially when it is based on emotions and not facts. And TV3 is certainly guilty of reporting from this angle if you watch their 8pm news.

    May 29, 2008 at 2:25 pm

  3. hamzah said:

    Ketuanan Rakyat!

    Ketuanan Melayu = Rekaan Kroni Umno!

    May 29, 2008 at 2:30 pm

  4. Maverick said:

    Hi ,
    the malay dailies and other malay vernaculars are ferociously promoting and painting pictures of hatred on to lives of peace loving and tolerant Malaysian society. Kindly refrain from these UMNO held entities and boycot them outrightly. The battle cry is to be Bangsa Malaysia and not ketuanan melayu.

    May 29, 2008 at 3:09 pm

  5. Robb said:

    damn good read. A+. Lol.

    May 29, 2008 at 3:16 pm

  6. Ironic said:

    Man I nearly muntah darah.
    Will not let the oppressor oppress this mind.

    May 29, 2008 at 3:43 pm

  7. r.p said:

    Why all the quotes contain the word “Melayu”?
    How about “Chinese”? =S

    May 29, 2008 at 3:47 pm

  8. Kenny Law said:

    r.p,
    I assume you didn’t read the articles? The point is that Utusan Malaysia is trying to incite racial hatred. I will still write this same article if there is any talk of Ketuanan Cina or Ketuanan India.

    May 29, 2008 at 4:02 pm

  9. menj said:

    Don’t be bothered about it, Utusan Meloya have been spouting such rhetoric for years, and I am not talking about after 8th March 2008.

    - MENJ

    May 29, 2008 at 5:49 pm

  10. zewt said:

    boycott them long ago. but bloggers are helping them promote ;)

    May 30, 2008 at 12:20 am

  11. cougar said:

    Definitely a racist newspaper.

    May 30, 2008 at 1:44 am

  12. zewt said:

    just dont read them… ignore them, that is the best treatment.

    June 3, 2008 at 11:11 pm

  13. mahendran said:

    ahahaha the only news i get of Utusan is either tru other blogs, or sumtimes i visit their online version.

    boycott Utusan? works fine with me, makes not an inch of difference pon :P never bought them.hahaha

    I cant understand (k im pretending) ..y the Home Ministry never takes action against this one national newspaper tat publishes things full of provocative articles??

    June 4, 2008 at 4:24 am

  14. Kenny Law said:

    zewt, mahendran,
    True that boycotting them won’t make a difference to them, since we are not their readers anyway. But I still remain shocked at the race-baiting that is being published so regularly.

    June 4, 2008 at 11:10 am

  15. Who Determines Malaysian History? | Malaysians Say The Darndest Things! said:

    [...] Social contract. Hak-hak keistimewaan (which most people talk about, but is never defined clearly). Everyday fare from Utusan Malaysia. Since this is UMNO Youth, they just want to brainwash the youths not to question the NEP, even [...]

    June 4, 2008 at 1:51 pm

Leave A Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


eXTReMe Tracker